TRIBUNAL D’ARBITRAGE

 

ARBITRATION IN VIRTUE OF THE REGULATION RESPECTING THE GUARANTEE PLAN FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

(O.C. 841-98 of June 17, 1998)

 

Arbitration body authorized by the Régie du bâtiment du Québec:

CANADIAN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION CENTRE

 

 

                                                                                                                ALLISTER HARDIMAN                                                     ULA HISCOCK

 

                                                                                                  (hereinafter «the Beneficiaries»)

 

v.                                                                                        

       BÉNA CONSTRUCTION INC.

 

(hereinafter «the Contractor»)

 

and                                                                 

                                                                                                  LA GARANTIE ABRITAT INC.

 

(hereinafter «the Manager»)

 

 

File No. CCAC:                               S14-082001-NP

File No. Manager:                            14-339JP

 

                ARBITRATION DECISION

 

Arbitrator:                                                                 Me Philippe Patry

 

For the Beneficiaries:                                             Mrs. Ula Hiscock

                                                                                  Mr. Allister Hardiman

         

For the Contractor:                                                  Mr. Yaoub Yaoub

                                                                                                                                                        

For the Manager:                                                     Me Julie Parenteau, counsel

                                                                                                              Mr. Martin Bérubé, 

Inspector-Conciliator

 

Date of decision:                                                     August 28, 2015

 

 

 

 

Identification of the Parties

 

 

Arbitrator:                                                       Me Philippe Patry

                                                                                                Place du Canada

1010 De la Gauchetière West

Suite 950

Montréal (Québec) H3B 2N2

 

Beneficiaries:                                                Mrs. Ula Hiscock

                                                                        Mr. Allister Hardiman

                                                                        […] Gatineau (Québec) […]

 

Contractor:                                                     Béna Construction Inc.

Mr. Yaoub Yaoub

117 Front Street

Suite 200

Gatineau (Québec) J9H 5S9

 

Manager:                                                        La Garantie Abritat Inc.

                                                                        5930, Louis-H. Lafontaine Boulevard

Anjou (Québec) H1M 1S7

and its counsel:

Me Julie Parenteau

Mr. Martin Bérubé,

Inspector-Conciliator

                                                                       

Decision

           

          Mandate:

 

The Arbitrator received its mandate from the CCAC on September 23, 2014.

 

          History of File:

 

November 9, 2012:               Preliminary Contract and Guarantee Contract;

 

March 1st, 2013:                    Deed of sale; Acceptance of building;

 

March 13, 2014:                    Correspondence of the Beneficiaries to the Contractor;

 

April 10, 2014:                       Claim request by the Beneficiaries;

 

April 25, 2014:                       Notice of 15 days by the Manager to the Contractor;

 

April 30, 2014:                       Correspondence of the Contractor to the Manager;

 

July 2, 2014:                          Inspection by the Manager;

 

August 5, 2014:                     Decision by the Manager;

 

August 20, 2014:                              Reception by the CCAC of the Request for Arbitration of the Beneficiaries dated August 20, 2014;      

 

October 23, 2014:                 Receipt of exhibits from the Manager;

 

November 19, 2014:             Preliminary hearing by telephone conference;

 

December 3, 2014:              Preliminary hearing by telephone conference;

 

January 7, 2015:                   Preliminary hearing by telephone conference;

 

February 13, 2015:               Preliminary hearing by telephone conference;

 

May 6, 2015:                          Reception of the inspection report from the Beneficiaries;

 

May 29, 2015:                       Preliminary hearing by telephone conference;

 

June 18, 2015:                      Confirmation that the hearing will be held on August 4, 2015 at the Palais de justice de Gatineau;

 

July 30, 2015:                        Reception of the Beneficiaries’ withdrawal of their demand for arbitration; cancelation of the hearing.

Introduction:

 

[1]        The Beneficiaries interjected appeal of the Manager’s decision dated August 5, 2014 concerning “the hardwood floor”.

 

[2]        In an email correspondence dated July 30, 2015, the Beneficiaries confirmed that they wanted to forego the current arbitration and to pursue a recourse before the Small Claims Court following the advice of their lawyer.

 

[3]        Hence, the Arbitration Tribunal takes act of the withdrawal by the Beneficiaries of their demand for arbitration with respect to disorders affecting the hardwood floor. It will not rule on the merits of this matter. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal declares the case closed.

 

Arbitration fees:

 

[4]        The Manager’s representative argued on August 12, 2015 that the Beneficiaries had not succeeded on any aspect of their claim given that they decided to forego arbitration and thus, offered to share equally the costs. As for the Beneficiaries, they mentioned that they had been informed initially it would cost them between $50.00 and $150.00 to proceed to the arbitration of their claim. They added that they had already incurred $500.00 for the cost of the inspection report submitted.

 

[5]        In conformity with Subsection 123 (2) of the Regulation respecting the guarantee plan for new residential buildings[1] (the Plan), the Manager and the Beneficiaries shall split the costs of the current arbitration.

 

FOR THESE REASONS, THE ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL:

 

TAKES act of the withdrawal by the Beneficiaries of their demand for arbitration dated August 20, 2014;

 

DECLARES the arbitration case closed;

 

CONDEMNS the Beneficiaries to pay the amount of $150.00 as costs of the present arbitration and the Manager to pay the remaining balance of these costs.

 

Montréal, August 28, 2015

 

 

_________________________

ME PHILIPPE PATRY

Arbitrator / CCAC



[1]                            O.C. 841-98.