[1]      The tenant, Ms. Noivo, prevails upon the Tribunal to revoke a decision which was rendered by the undersigned on July 25, 2014.

[2]      The Court Record reveals that when the initial hearing took place on July 21, 2014, both Ms. Noivo and one of the landlords were present.

[3]      After hearing the parties, the tribunal took the case under advisement and in a decision which was rendered shortly thereafter, resiliated the lease and condemned the tenant to pay to the landlords arrears of rent in the amount of $ 1,886 plus interest and costs.

[4]      The tribunal also declared that its decision was provisionally executory notwithstanding appeal.

[5]      The tenant filed her Application for revocation on August 6, 2014.

[6]      The revocation recourse is grounded on Article 89 of an Act respecting the Régie du logement :

« 89. Where a decision has been rendered against a party who was prevented from producing or supplying evidence by surprise, by fraud or by any other reason considered sufficient, that party may apply for the revocation of the decision.

A party may also apply for the revocation of the decision where the board has omitted to adjudicate upon part of the demand or has decided beyond the application.

The application for revocation must be made in writing within ten days after the decision is known or from the time the cause of prevention ceases, as the case may be.

The application for revocation suspends the execution of the decision and interrupts the time allowed for appeal or review until the parties are notified of the decision. »

[7]      However, an examination of the Application of August 6, 2014 reveals that the tenant submitted absolutely no grounds which would justify the revocation of the decision which the tribunal rendered in the landlords’ favor.

[8]      In fact, the Application simply alleges that the tenant is ill, has lost her job and is unable to move out at the present time.

[9]      The tribunal heard the tenant on August 18, 2014. The landlords did not attend the hearing.

[10]   Ms. Noivo confirmed that her request for a revocation was grounded on her personal difficulties alone but advised the Tribunal that she fully intended to move out of the dwelling on the 31^st of August, 2014.

[11]   Given the absence of allegations or evidence in support of the tenant’s request that the decision of July 25, 2014 be revoked, her Application will be dismissed.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE TRIBUNAL :

[12]   DISMISSES the tenant’s Application.